A
AIverse
← Back
Compare

Continue vs Cursor

An open-source AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains. Continue brings autocomplete, chat and agentic edits to your editor using any model you choose — including local models via Ollama — a free, private alternative to Copilot.

Winner: Cursor(⭐ 4.8)

🧠 Expert verdict

Our expert verdict: Cursor is the stronger all-round choice, scoring 4.8/5 versus 4.6/5 for Continue, and it stands out for "Deep codebase-aware AI chat". If budget is your priority, Continue (Free / Open Source) is the more affordable option. Choose Cursor if you want the best code tool overall, especially for ai-assisted coding; pick Continue if "Free, open-source Copilot alternative" matters more for your workflow.

Continue

An open-source AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains. Continue brings autocomplete, chat and agentic edits to your editor using any model you choose — including local models via Ollama — a free, private alternative to Copilot.

Visit Continue

Cursor

AI-first code editor forked from VS Code with deep chat, autocomplete, and codebase-aware edits.

Visit Cursor
CriteriaContinueCursor
Rating
4.6/5
4.8/5
Pricing
Free / Open Source
Free / $20/mo
Category
code
code
Popularity
👍 Medium
🔥 Very High
Value for Money
⭐⭐⭐ Excellent
⭐⭐ Good
📅 Release Date
2023
2023
🔄 Last Update
Aug 2026
May 2026
Company
Continue
Anysphere
Founded
2023
2022
API Access
No
No
Mobile App
No
No

Continue

Pros

  • +Free, open-source Copilot alternative
  • +Bring your own model (incl. local)
  • +VS Code and JetBrains support
  • +Autocomplete, chat and edits
  • +Private when used with local models

Cons

  • You configure your own model/keys
  • Local models need decent hardware
  • Less turnkey than Copilot
  • Quality depends on the model chosen

Cursor

Pros

  • +Deep codebase-aware AI chat
  • +Excellent multi-line autocomplete (Tab)
  • +Familiar VS Code interface & extensions
  • +Multi-file AI editing

Cons

  • Subscription needed for full power
  • Can be resource-intensive on large repos
  • Occasional context limits on huge codebases

🎯 Best forContinue

In-editor AI codingPrivate coding with local modelsCopilot replacementCustom model workflows

🎯 Best forCursor

AI-assisted codingCodebase refactoringBug fixingCode reviewExploring unfamiliar codebases

🏷️ TagsContinue

Open SourceCodingVS CodeCopilot alternative

🏷️ TagsCursor

CodeIDEAI Pair ProgrammingVS Code

Our Verdict

After comparing ratings, pricing and features, Cursor comes out ahead with a 4.8/5 rating. It is the better choice for most users.

Expert take on each tool

📌 Continue

Continue is the leading open-source AI coding assistant: bring any model — even a local one via Ollama — for free, private autocomplete and chat in VS Code or JetBrains. The top pick for developers who want Copilot power without the subscription or the cloud.

📌 Cursor

Cursor is the top choice for developers who want an AI-native IDE with deep codebase understanding and powerful multi-file editing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Continue or Cursor?

Cursor has the higher user rating (4.8/5 vs 4.6/5), making it the stronger overall pick. That said, Continue can still be the better fit depending on your budget and specific needs — see the full comparison above.

Is Continue or Cursor cheaper?

Continue (Free / Open Source) is generally more budget-friendly than Cursor (Free / $20/mo). If cost is your main concern, Continue is worth trying first — but compare the feature sets above to confirm it covers what you need.

Can I switch from Continue to Cursor?

Yes — switching between Continue and Cursor is usually straightforward since both are code tools with similar core workflows. Most users can export their data and get started with Cursor within a day; just check Cursor's free plan before committing to a paid tier.