A
AIverse
← Back
Compare

Hermes 4 vs ChatGPT

Nous Research's open-weight Hermes 4 family (14B / 70B / 405B) — a steerable, neutrally-aligned reasoning model with a hybrid 'thinking' mode, strong function calling and structured JSON output for agentic builders.

Winner: ChatGPT(⭐ 4.9)

🧠 Expert verdict

Our expert verdict: ChatGPT is the stronger all-round choice, scoring 4.9/5 versus 4.4/5 for Hermes 4, and it stands out for "Now runs GPT-5.6 (free tier included)". Choose ChatGPT if you want the best writing tool overall, especially for writing & editing; pick Hermes 4 if "Highly steerable, neutrally aligned" matters more for your workflow.

Hermes 4

Nous Research's open-weight Hermes 4 family (14B / 70B / 405B) — a steerable, neutrally-aligned reasoning model with a hybrid 'thinking' mode, strong function calling and structured JSON output for agentic builders.

Visit Hermes 4

ChatGPT

OpenAI's flagship assistant, now powered by GPT-5.6 (the Sol / Terra / Luna family, GA July 2026). The free tier defaults to GPT-5.6 with GPT-5.5 still available. Text, coding, reasoning, image generation, voice and a ChatGPT Work app — the largest all-in-one AI ecosystem.

Visit ChatGPT
CriteriaHermes 4ChatGPT
Rating
4.4/5
4.9/5
Pricing
Open weights / API via providers
Free / $20/mo
Category
writing
writing
Popularity
👍 Medium
🔥 Very High
Value for Money
⭐⭐ Good
⭐⭐ Good
📅 Release Date
Aug 2025
Nov 2022
🔄 Last Update
Jun 2026
Aug 2026
Company
Nous Research
OpenAI
Founded
2023
2022
API Access
Yes
Yes
Mobile App
No
Yes

Hermes 4

Pros

  • +Highly steerable, neutrally aligned
  • +Hybrid reasoning (think vs. answer)
  • +Excellent function calling & JSON mode
  • +Three sizes incl. 405B
  • +Fully open weights

Cons

  • Raw model — you handle safety/guardrails
  • Largest size is hardware-heavy
  • Not as polished as hosted assistants
  • Smaller mainstream ecosystem

ChatGPT

Pros

  • +Now runs GPT-5.6 (free tier included)
  • +Largest ecosystem & plugins
  • +Built-in image generation & voice
  • +ChatGPT Work app for teams
  • +Largest user base and integrations

Cons

  • Pro/advanced tiers are pricey
  • Data privacy considerations
  • Can still hallucinate facts
  • Best features behind paid plans

🎯 Best forHermes 4

Custom agents with tool useStructured JSON pipelinesResearch and fine-tuningUncensored, neutral assistants

🎯 Best forChatGPT

Writing & editingCode generationResearchCustomer supportImage creation

🏷️ TagsHermes 4

LLMOpen WeightsReasoningFunction CallingSteerable

🏷️ TagsChatGPT

LLMChatBotGPT-5.6ImagesVoice

Our Verdict

After comparing ratings, pricing and features, ChatGPT comes out ahead with a 4.9/5 rating. It is the better choice for most users.

Expert take on each tool

📌 Hermes 4

Hermes 4 is the model for builders who want maximum control and neutral alignment, with first-class function calling and JSON output. It rewards teams comfortable adding their own guardrails in exchange for a highly steerable open model.

📌 ChatGPT

ChatGPT remains the best all-in-one AI assistant in 2026, now powered by GPT-5.6 even on the free tier, with image generation, voice and the widest plugin ecosystem. Ideal for general use, content creation and coding — the safe default for most people.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Hermes 4 or ChatGPT?

ChatGPT has the higher user rating (4.9/5 vs 4.4/5), making it the stronger overall pick. That said, Hermes 4 can still be the better fit depending on your budget and specific needs — see the full comparison above.

Is Hermes 4 or ChatGPT cheaper?

Hermes 4 (Open weights / API via providers) and ChatGPT (Free / $20/mo) sit at a similar price point. The best way to compare actual cost is to check each tool's plans for the specific features and usage limits you need.

Can I switch from Hermes 4 to ChatGPT?

Yes — switching between Hermes 4 and ChatGPT is usually straightforward since both are writing tools with similar core workflows. Most users can export their data and get started with ChatGPT within a day; just check ChatGPT's free plan before committing to a paid tier.