A
AIverse
← Back
Compare

Squoosh vs TinyPNG

Free open-source image compression web app by Google — compare and compress images in the browser.

Winner: TinyPNG(⭐ 4.8)

🧠 Expert verdict

Our expert verdict: TinyPNG is the stronger all-round choice, scoring 4.8/5 versus 4.7/5 for Squoosh, and it stands out for "Excellent PNG/JPEG/WebP compression with minimal quality loss". If budget is your priority, Squoosh (Free) is the more affordable option. Choose TinyPNG if you want the best compression tool overall, especially for optimizing images for websites; pick Squoosh if "Free & open-source, runs entirely in-browser" matters more for your workflow.

Squoosh

Free open-source image compression web app by Google — compare and compress images in the browser.

Visit Squoosh

TinyPNG

Smart PNG, JPEG and WebP image compression — reduce file sizes by up to 80% without visible quality loss.

Visit TinyPNG
CriteriaSquooshTinyPNG
Rating
4.7/5
4.8/5
Pricing
Free
Free / $29/mo
Category
compression
compression
Popularity
🔥 Very High
🔥 Very High
Value for Money
⭐⭐⭐ Excellent
⭐⭐ Good
📅 Release Date
2018
2013
🔄 Last Update
2026
2026
Company
Google (Chrome Labs)
TinyPNG (Voormedia)
Founded
2018
2013
API Access
No
Yes
Mobile App
No
No

Squoosh

Pros

  • +Free & open-source, runs entirely in-browser
  • +Real-time before/after comparison slider
  • +Supports modern formats like WebP and AVIF
  • +Granular manual compression controls

Cons

  • No bulk/batch processing
  • No account or cloud storage
  • Manual tuning needed for best results

TinyPNG

Pros

  • +Excellent PNG/JPEG/WebP compression with minimal quality loss
  • +Simple drag-and-drop interface
  • +API & plugins for automation (WordPress, etc.)
  • +Bulk compression support

Cons

  • Limited free uploads per month
  • No advanced image editing features
  • Web-based only, no desktop app

🎯 Best forSquoosh

Fine-tuning individual image compressionConverting images to WebP/AVIFPrivacy-friendly local image optimizationLearning image compression trade-offs

🎯 Best forTinyPNG

Optimizing images for websitesReducing app asset sizesBulk image compression via APIWordPress media optimization

🏷️ TagsSquoosh

CompressionImage OptimizationOpen-SourceBrowser Tool

🏷️ TagsTinyPNG

CompressionImage OptimizationWeb Performance

Our Verdict

After comparing ratings, pricing and features, TinyPNG comes out ahead with a 4.8/5 rating. It is the better choice for most users.

Expert take on each tool

📌 Squoosh

Squoosh is best for developers and designers who want precise, hands-on control over image compression with instant visual feedback, while TinyPNG wins for quick bulk automation.

📌 TinyPNG

TinyPNG is the go-to tool for fast, high-quality image compression with strong developer-friendly API and plugin support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Squoosh or TinyPNG?

TinyPNG has the higher user rating (4.8/5 vs 4.7/5), making it the stronger overall pick. That said, Squoosh can still be the better fit depending on your budget and specific needs — see the full comparison above.

Is Squoosh or TinyPNG cheaper?

Squoosh (Free) is generally more budget-friendly than TinyPNG (Free / $29/mo). If cost is your main concern, Squoosh is worth trying first — but compare the feature sets above to confirm it covers what you need.

Can I switch from Squoosh to TinyPNG?

Yes — switching between Squoosh and TinyPNG is usually straightforward since both are compression tools with similar core workflows. Most users can export their data and get started with TinyPNG within a day; just check TinyPNG's free plan before committing to a paid tier.