A
AIverse
← Back
Compare

TinyPNG vs Squoosh

Smart PNG, JPEG and WebP image compression — reduce file sizes by up to 80% without visible quality loss.

Winner: TinyPNG(⭐ 4.8)

🧠 Expert verdict

Our expert verdict: TinyPNG is the stronger all-round choice, scoring 4.8/5 versus 4.7/5 for Squoosh, and it stands out for "Excellent PNG/JPEG/WebP compression with minimal quality loss". If budget is your priority, Squoosh (Free) is the more affordable option. Choose TinyPNG if you want the best compression tool overall, especially for optimizing images for websites; pick Squoosh if "Free & open-source, runs entirely in-browser" matters more for your workflow.

TinyPNG

Smart PNG, JPEG and WebP image compression — reduce file sizes by up to 80% without visible quality loss.

Visit TinyPNG

Squoosh

Free open-source image compression web app by Google — compare and compress images in the browser.

Visit Squoosh
CriteriaTinyPNGSquoosh
Rating
4.8/5
4.7/5
Pricing
Free / $29/mo
Free
Category
compression
compression
Popularity
🔥 Very High
🔥 Very High
Value for Money
⭐⭐ Good
⭐⭐⭐ Excellent
📅 Release Date
2013
2018
🔄 Last Update
2026
2026
Company
TinyPNG (Voormedia)
Google (Chrome Labs)
Founded
2013
2018
API Access
Yes
No
Mobile App
No
No

TinyPNG

Pros

  • +Excellent PNG/JPEG/WebP compression with minimal quality loss
  • +Simple drag-and-drop interface
  • +API & plugins for automation (WordPress, etc.)
  • +Bulk compression support

Cons

  • Limited free uploads per month
  • No advanced image editing features
  • Web-based only, no desktop app

Squoosh

Pros

  • +Free & open-source, runs entirely in-browser
  • +Real-time before/after comparison slider
  • +Supports modern formats like WebP and AVIF
  • +Granular manual compression controls

Cons

  • No bulk/batch processing
  • No account or cloud storage
  • Manual tuning needed for best results

🎯 Best forTinyPNG

Optimizing images for websitesReducing app asset sizesBulk image compression via APIWordPress media optimization

🎯 Best forSquoosh

Fine-tuning individual image compressionConverting images to WebP/AVIFPrivacy-friendly local image optimizationLearning image compression trade-offs

🏷️ TagsTinyPNG

CompressionImage OptimizationWeb Performance

🏷️ TagsSquoosh

CompressionImage OptimizationOpen-SourceBrowser Tool

Our Verdict

After comparing ratings, pricing and features, TinyPNG comes out ahead with a 4.8/5 rating. It is the better choice for most users.

Expert take on each tool

📌 TinyPNG

TinyPNG is the go-to tool for fast, high-quality image compression with strong developer-friendly API and plugin support.

📌 Squoosh

Squoosh is best for developers and designers who want precise, hands-on control over image compression with instant visual feedback, while TinyPNG wins for quick bulk automation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: TinyPNG or Squoosh?

TinyPNG has the higher user rating (4.8/5 vs 4.7/5), making it the stronger overall pick. That said, Squoosh can still be the better fit depending on your budget and specific needs — see the full comparison above.

Is TinyPNG or Squoosh cheaper?

Squoosh (Free) is generally more budget-friendly than TinyPNG (Free / $29/mo). If cost is your main concern, Squoosh is worth trying first — but compare the feature sets above to confirm it covers what you need.

Can I switch from TinyPNG to Squoosh?

Yes — switching between TinyPNG and Squoosh is usually straightforward since both are compression tools with similar core workflows. Most users can export their data and get started with Squoosh within a day; just check Squoosh's free plan before committing to a paid tier.